3 ms·
> Freedom of speech does not imply freedom from consequence. This is double speak. If the government throws you in jail for saying something, you could say the
by insickness 8y ago
> Freedom of speech does not imply freedom from consequence.
This is double speak. If the government throws you in jail for saying something, you could say the same thing. You had freedom of speech but not freedom from consequence. You're distorting the meaning of freedom of speech.
- yzmtf2008 8y ago>If the government throws you in jail for saying something, you could say the same thing. Which is why we have the first amendment, and why it covers government only.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- krapp 8y agoAre you claiming that free speech means merchants should be forced to do business with customers they don't approve of? Or that no one who disagrees with a particular point of view should be able to express that disagreement? Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence when that consequence is also an expression of free speech.