> the problem is due to the assumption that cooking with salt, fat, and sugar is unheathly I agree: it's not. Eating healthy is about getting enough of each mi

> the problem is due to the assumption that cooking with salt, fat, and sugar is unheathly I agree: it's not. Eating healthy is about getting enough of each micronutrient (not typically a problem) and not too much macronutrient(s). The problem is that people use questionable proxies for this. "McDonald's is bad," "Whole Foods is good," "home cooking is angelic mana straight from the heavens!" -- when in fact Grandma's potato salad with ranch dressing, cheese, and croutons probably has a substantially worse macronutrient profile than a BigMac, the pizza at Whole Foods probably isn't significantly better for you than the pizza at Domino's, and the seared + oil drizzled + salted veggies in a restaurant probably have about the same nutritional content as the equivalent you make at home. I also agree about tomatoes: it is in fact possible to fix them with salt and fat instead of fixing them with sugar. You can definitely get a more intense tomato taste than the store if you water them less than a commercial outfit would. I'm not nearly as crazy for this as most people seem to be, though. Good for salads, bad for sandwiches, but not to a degree that ignites my passions either way. "Heirloom" status is completely beside the point, except as advertising, for which it is solid psychological gold. > I LOVE microwaved/steamed/boiled corn on the cob with or without salt or butter. Yeah, because it's a sugary vegge-grain-fruit and sugar is good even without salt and butter. Of course, put some salt and butter on there and you have the holy trinity, which is downright delicious!