I think one of the things that makes Go library code so easy to read is the lack of generics. Everything you need to understand the code is right in front of yo

I think one of the things that makes Go library code so easy to read is the lack of generics. Everything you need to understand the code is right in front of you, without the barrier of having to learn new sets of complicated abstractions or worrying that some obscure code in some other file impacts/is invisibly called by the function. With large code bases written in other programming languages, I have to spend an inordinate amount of time studying the code base and object relations before making changes. For me, code readability is such a high value that, on these grounds alone, I oppose the introduction of generics and hope the current proposals ultimately fail.