5 ms·
Right, but a lot of the times the information required for the manual process is also compromised. This just lowers the security level down to whatever the manu
by ihattendorf 8y ago
Right, but a lot of the times the information required for the manual process is also compromised. This just lowers the security level down to whatever the manual process is.
- wolfgang42 8y agoI think it raises the security to that of the manual process. Unless you're saying that right now the system of freezing and unfreezing is more secure than one-time codes would be?
- ihattendorf 8y agoYou're right. I was thinking of it from the point of lowering it from a hypothetical hardware device to the manual process instead of raising it from the current system.
- wolfgang42 8y agoAh, got it. But a hardware device would still need a manual fallback :)