3 ms·
It's disingenuous firstly because we're treating market share as the only measure of success for a browser. Obviously if that's the case, it matters little wha
by antisthenes 8y ago
It's disingenuous firstly because we're treating market share as the only measure of success for a browser.
Obviously if that's the case, it matters little what niche browsers do anyway - because they lost the battle to Chrome years ago.
- Vinnl 8y agoI would say it's an important measure of success though: a lot of what Mozilla can do, it can only do thanks to its market share. This includes influencing the W3C, lobbying politicians with actual experience making a browser, and financially supporting that work. Furthermore, if Mozilla had a market share of 80%, they would have been in a far better position to actually fight EME.