> True, but you have missed the part that makes C++ safer than C. Of course C++ is safer than C. I was just responding to what I quoted, which unfairly lumps

> True, but you have missed the part that makes C++ safer than C. Of course C++ is safer than C. I was just responding to what I quoted, which unfairly lumps "unsafe" and "C" in the same turn of phrase, implying that avoiding C-like code avoids unsafety as well.