4 ms·
I guess I was focusing on the bit-level answers since that's what the article and most of the comments seem to value the highest. You're right, though, the ori
by BigZaphod 16y ago
I guess I was focusing on the bit-level answers since that's what the article and most of the comments seem to value the highest.
You're right, though, the original question itself is not so much of a problem, I suppose. What bothered me is the subtext that, unless you get down to the bit level with the minimum possible number of CPU instructions in the result and do the compiler's job yourself, you're not a "real programmer" or something.
- leif 16y agoI disagree. A "real programmer" should know something about how the computer works, and should not revere anything below his level as "magic" or be afraid of it, even if he/she will never need to deal with it. Understanding that integers are stored as binary bitstrings, and what this means, is the most basic level of competency in this area.