3 ms·
I despise EME and disable it but, I agree, they had no choice. I'm sure that 5% share would be more like 0.001%, all idealistic goofs like me. So "for no gain w
by kgwxd 8y ago
I despise EME and disable it but, I agree, they had no choice. I'm sure that 5% share would be more like 0.001%, all idealistic goofs like me. So "for no gain whatsoever" is not only unprovable, I'm pretty sure it's very wrong. Some choices at at Mozilla have annoyed me greatly but many have made me very happy. I think they've been a net positive influence for user interests.
- mjw1007 8y agoI don't think it would have been so bad for them. If I liked Firefox better than Chrome but Firefox didn't let me watch films in my web browser, I'd run Firefox day to day and open Chrome when I wanted to watch a film. In my experience running a second browser for one particular troublesome site is something not-particularly-technical people often end up doing without worrying about it too much.
- amaccuish 8y agoI did that and it was annoying. I'm glad they've put DRM in, and if you don't want it, you can just ignore the install prompt.