5 ms·
In the US, the idea that the federal government could issue such a ban would be preposterous. It's a matter of principle. The state shouldn't be regulating thes
by beefheart 8y ago
In the US, the idea that the federal government could issue such a ban would be preposterous. It's a matter of principle. The state shouldn't be regulating these kinds of things, it only makes a mockery of itself.
- blattimwind 8y agoAh come on, your federal government messes around in so many things that are covered by a thin veil of constitutional backing, a charade.
- yodsanklai 8y ago> The state shouldn't be regulating these kinds of things, it only makes a mockery of itself. so who should be regulating what happens in public schools?
- zzzcpan 8y agoBut schools are already pretty heavily regulated by the state in the US. Is media/public not aware of this at all?
- dragonwriter 8y ago> In the US, the idea that the federal government could issue such a ban would be preposterous. Yes, but only because the US is a federal republic where the states, not the central government, have general police powers. That kind of blanket regulation would not be particularly out of line with the kind of thing state laws regulate in schools, however.