5 ms·
>one famously by posting a sexist rant that got him fired. Did you even read what Damore wrote? It is neither sexist nor a rant.
by remarkEon 8y ago
>one famously by posting a sexist rant that got him fired.
Did you even read what Damore wrote? It is neither sexist nor a rant.
- komali2 8y agoIt certainly wasn't scientific, so it's hard to argue it was some sort of decrying of the fall of rationality. He had a singular reason to write it, I argue a sexist one. Seeing as he didn't have science to back up his claims.
- remarkEon 8y agoThis is just another mischaracterization. >He had a singular reason to write it, I argue a sexist one. He specifically stated his objective was to help Google with its own diversity and gender equality goals. >Seeing as he didn't have science to back up his claims. https://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists-respond/ https://quillette.com/2017/08/07/google-memo-four-scientists... I find it increasingly fascinating that in the response to Damore's memo people continually provide evidence that this echo chamber does indeed exist, and that people actually are reading different things from the same text.