3 ms·
> w/o destroying concurrency guarantees Pods will provide more than that since you can provide concurrency guarantees with locks only. However, Pods should ad
by fogus 16y ago
> w/o destroying concurrency guarantees
Pods will provide more than that since you can provide concurrency guarantees with locks only. However, Pods should additionally help with:
1. Separation of mutation logic and value policy with the Pod handling the underlying juggling
2. Lock order acquisition guarantees
There is more to it than this, but stay tuned for Rich's upcoming talk at the Clojure Conj. :-)
- swannodette 16y agoI meant to write "w/o destroying concurrency guarantees and w/o adding undue complexity". With Pods you don't need explicit locking from what I understand, right?
- fogus 16y ago> With Pods you don't need explicit locking from what I understand, right? That is my understanding yes.