2 ms·
> so you don't need to take the responsibility of hiring people with the huge risk that comes with that. There's plenty of people who won't do it -- they can g
by gt2 8y ago
> so you don't need to take the responsibility of hiring people with the huge risk that comes with that.
There's plenty of people who won't do it -- they can go to FAANG and established companies all over the world. Good for them.
There's a good amount of great people, often the hustlers you need for a smaller business, who would be interested in doing it.
It's only one possibility. As I said, the other option is showing portfolio/past experience with references, which if checked well is a good indicator.
Also I said this because the OP said one of the positions was sales, which usually has compensation highly attached to results, so those guys are used to it. Might even say completely attached to results, as they are shown the door if they aren't giving results.
- pmiller2 8y agoNot even FAANG. I would say a majority of companies do the pattern of recruiter call, 1-2 phone screens, and 1/2-1 day onsite. For the candidate, it's a no brainer: invest a week or invest a day. The end result is approximately the same either way, unless your company is super special in some manner.
- gt2 8y agoYeah, I hear ya. But he said sales and graphic designer. I think that's a bit different than developer or management.