4 ms·
Cool project (legal/ethical issues aside)! My big question is why bother with OCR at all? Presumably you can construct a representation of the screen for each q
by stilley2 8y ago
Cool project (legal/ethical issues aside)! My big question is why bother with OCR at all? Presumably you can construct a representation of the screen for each question ahead of time, and you already solve the projective transform due to the camera, so at that point why not pick some appropriate distance metric and pick the question/answer pair corresponding to the virtual image that is closest to the camera image?
- dclowd9901 8y agoAt the very least, they probably mix up the order of the answers. On that basis, you immediately multiply the variants by 4!. I wonder if it would be faster to do that comparison or not. And this ignores any potential background animations or other non-static entities on the screen there might be.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jamesough 8y agoThey mix up the answers. And sometimes choose 4 answers from a possible selection of 20.
- stilley2 8y agoAh that makes sense. Thanks
- kwhitefoot 8y ago> ethical issues aside What might they be? It seems to me perfectly ethical to fight back against the heavily stacked odds.