3 ms·
For the analogy, I'd replace 'unit-testable' with reusable
by sorokod 8y ago
For the analogy, I'd replace 'unit-testable' with reusable
- shoo 8y agoI'd argue for something stronger: both reusable and useful (outside of the initial application) and novel. It's possible to write structurally reusable components that are useless, i.e. they do a thing that no one wants or needs.