3 ms·
I think it might be more akin to a programmer complaining about a monolithic/black-box chunk of code that can't easily be split into understandable and/or unit-
by neuronexmachina 8y ago
I think it might be more akin to a programmer complaining about a monolithic/black-box chunk of code that can't easily be split into understandable and/or unit-testable functions.
- sorokod 8y agoFor the analogy, I'd replace 'unit-testable' with reusable
- shoo 8y agoI'd argue for something stronger: both reusable and useful (outside of the initial application) and novel. It's possible to write structurally reusable components that are useless, i.e. they do a thing that no one wants or needs.