3 ms·
"It not being open source is a political argument, not a technical one." If I can compare the open source to the reverse engineered code to see what I'm really
by ac4tw 8y ago
"It not being open source is a political argument, not a technical one."
If I can compare the open source to the reverse engineered code to see what I'm really using/getting, that seems like a technical advantage. Also, all of the reverse engineered code I've worked with has been difficult and time consuming to digest (missing var names, comments etc); open source gives me a technical advantage in analyzing and understanding the code. Lastly, looking at a companies open source lets me assess their technical sophistication and practices which also seems like a technical advantage.
I haven't spent much time thinking on this subject, but the political aspect seems to be the line of thinking that says: you will engender trust by making a project open source.
Is your reasoning similar?
Also are there good tools for reverse engineering iOS deployments?
- CiPHPerCoder 8y agoThere is one tangible benefit to open source: reproducible builds. Everything else comes down to personnel, budget, and scheduling. I'm not an Apple consumer, I don't know anything about iOS in particular.
- saagarjha 8y ago> Also are there good tools for reverse engineering iOS deployments? There are many; since apps are native on iOS a standard disassembler would work. But there are many more specialized tools, such as class-dump and Hopper.