> No, measurement is just a poor choice of name for a type of interaction some matter can have with other matter. That's not the Copenhagen Interpretation. Int

> No, measurement is just a poor choice of name for a type of interaction some matter can have with other matter. That's not the Copenhagen Interpretation. Interpretations that claim this are called "Objective-collapse" theories. Back when I cared a lot about this, the most popular Objective-collapse theory was GRW: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-collapse_theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-collapse_theory