3 ms·
I read Schneier all the time and agree with him most of the time. Not once did he advocate not screening pilots, did he?
by borism 16y ago
I read Schneier all the time and agree with him most of the time.
Not once did he advocate not screening pilots, did he?
- wazoox 16y agoPlease read carefully : http://www.schneier.com/essay-304.html http://www.schneier.com/essay-304.html http://www.schneier.com/essay-245.html http://www.schneier.com/essay-245.html http://www.schneier.com/essay-299.html http://www.schneier.com/essay-299.html Security in airports is already much too high, too annoying and too costly. There must be a point when it stops getting tighter and tighter. It won't catch the next terrorist anyway. We need a better use of resources and people (better than taking away mineral water bottles, and full-body scanning everyone and his dog).
- borism 16y agoI absolutely agree that security measures have to achieve balance between security, comfort and civil liberties. But I'm still not seeing him advocating not screening the crew. And how could he advocate something like that. It would be like him saying "use strong encryption to protect your information, but make sure that passwords are written on post-its so it won't get lost".
- zargon 16y ago"I recommend that people write their passwords down on a small piece of paper, and keep it with their other valuable small pieces of paper: in their wallet." (http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/06/write_down_your.html http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/06/write_down_you...)
- borism 16y agoOh well... Nice!