3 ms·
There is no point in debating whether or not this is secure. The inclusion of that word in the title is going to derail all of the comments here. They are using
by lawnchair_larry 8y ago
There is no point in debating whether or not this is secure. The inclusion of that word in the title is going to derail all of the comments here. They are using secure from the point of a layman. We know nothing is secure, the folks working on the project know nothing is secure. The government folks and media outlets don’t understand security and their use of the word “secure” should be disregarded.
It would be better (and create more interesting discussion) to pretend that one is reading a title that says “security enhanced” operating system, and evaluate the merits of incremental improvements offered, and not debate whether or not anything can be truly secure.
- DINKDINK 8y agoRobust is probably a better word to describe attack resilience.
- renaudg 8y agoThis is actually a mistranslation. The original French text (https://clip-os.org/fr/ https://clip-os.org/fr/) says "système d’exploitation durci" (hardened operating system) and this has been translated as "secure" in the English version of that same page.