3 ms·
For me and my team, git is not the tie-in for github. PRs are. Those are the proprietary parts of GitHubs value proposition. We use them all the time and fine t
by matt_the_bass 8y ago
For me and my team, git is not the tie-in for github. PRs are. Those are the proprietary parts of GitHubs value proposition. We use them all the time and fine the review process pretty convenient. I haven’t tried gitlabs equivalent. I’m sure we could use them but we’d need to adjust our workflow. So we’ll stay at github until the cost of migrating is less than any pain points we find at GitHub
- tkxxx7 8y agoPRs seem to have the same functionality everywhere; I haven’t seen anything in Github that I couldn’t do in Bitbucket or Gitlab.
- dsumenkovic 8y agoPRs are related to MRs (Merge Requests), howver MRs have some additional features. Here you can read more about it https://about.gitlab.com/comparison/gitlab-merge-request-vs-github-pull-request.html https://about.gitlab.com/comparison/gitlab-merge-request-vs-...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]