3 ms·
That’s not a strawman. It’s reframing the original assertion to highlight the problems the author is ignoring. They are not claiming that this is the author’s a
by Ensorceled 8y ago
That’s not a strawman. It’s reframing the original assertion to highlight the problems the author is ignoring. They are not claiming that this is the author’s actual assertion so they can “knock it down”
If you disagree with the reframing, please explain why instead of shouting “fallacy”