3 ms·
I suppose it was a random example, but it's unfortunately a very bad one if it's about the USA, like most posts here presuppose. The infant mortality in the US
by idoubtit 8y ago
I suppose it was a random example, but it's unfortunately a very bad one if it's about the USA, like most posts here presuppose.
The infant mortality in the USA certainly did not decline on every recent year[^1].
And the bad news is that this rate is extremely high for a rich country, with a value similar to Serbia, half more than the average rate in Europe[^2].
This last "news" was even reported under the title "Our infant mortality rate is a national embarrassment"[^3].
[^1]: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db09.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db09.pdf
[^2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_and_under-five_mortality_rates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_an...
[^3]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/29/our-infant-mortality-rate-is-a-national-embarrassment/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/29/our-i...
- beat 8y agoIt's not completely random, although I didn't fact-check absolute specifics like you did. What I'm going to do in response is fact-check long term trends, which was my point. First site I checked shows that infant mortality in the US fell by about 50% from 1980-2010 (depending on category, but that's the trend in all categories). Someone did a paper on 1926 US infant mortality rates, and current rates are roughly 90% lower. I'm not comparing to Serbia, or to last year. I'm comparing to decades ago. By focusing on trend rather than momentary detail, I'm seeing the positive where you're seeing the negative.