I have found a good way of getting people to question chiropody more. Explaining that I am not entirely sure that necromancy has a place in modern medicine, ge

I have found a good way of getting people to question chiropody more. Explaining that I am not entirely sure that necromancy has a place in modern medicine, gets people to stop and ask me what I mean. I then have their attention to point out that according to the founder of the practice, the methods of chiropody were discovered by summoning a spirit from beyond the grave who apparently claimed to be a doctor. And therefore, either the founder is lying, or I am being expected to trust the motivations of some entity from the land of the dead that is capable of traveling between worlds and sees fit to present itself as a doctor, neither of which, on the face of it, looks like a good basis for trusting in a therapeutic technique.