> So the zone where there is clear unambiguous science is very small, and it's generally not the zone of contention in politics. Unless it's climate science, r

> So the zone where there is clear unambiguous science is very small, and it's generally not the zone of contention in politics. Unless it's climate science, reproductive health, evolutionary biology, the existence of "electromagnetic hypersensitivity", whether fracking causes earthquakes, or a list of other topics where denialism and, yes, outright lying have arisen to challenge science that the scientific community regards as unambiguously settled.