3 ms·
It's often the original creator of the CoC doing the weaponizing. Here are a few examples: * https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org
by malvosenior 8y ago
It's often the original creator of the CoC doing the weaponizing. Here are a few examples:
* https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12004
* https://github.com/nodejs/CTC/issues/165 https://github.com/nodejs/CTC/issues/165
* https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941
And really you can just go to CoralineAda's twitter to see that the CoC was designed as a political tool and an aggressive one at that.
- theossuary 8y agoThis probably isn't the best place to rehash the opal debacle. Suffice it to say I wouldn't feel comfortable committing to Opal, or working with "meh" after reading his tweets either. He's obviously willing to personally attack others with his own ignorance. I suppose I'm biased though. The nodejs example you linked to was a cluster-. I wouldn't blame the CoC for that though, the issue was/is with their organization. What should have been a conversation privately held between maintainers, turned into a public free-for-all; one put together by the maintainers themselves. I can't imagine PAM acting in the same fashion, I'd certainly expect a more professional approach. Like others have said, what'll really matter is how Linus presents himself publicly when he returns, and how his Lieutenants act publicly as well. I hope it'll lead to a better community, but changes like this can only be made in production, so only time will tell.