> But if the site relies on cookies and localStorage and cannot work without it, "no" option is equivalent of "ban". This - unless I misread it - is flat out w

> But if the site relies on cookies and localStorage and cannot work without it, "no" option is equivalent of "ban". This - unless I misread it - is flat out wrong for most of the cookie warnings I see. There's no valid reason for a news site to need cookies or similar except for logins. It can be proved easily by wiping cookies and verifying the site still works.