We need a way to determine if the debate responses are rational (not currently possible on free text without super non-existent AI or human moderators). Trying

We need a way to determine if the debate responses are rational (not currently possible on free text without super non-existent AI or human moderators). Trying to find common ground just eliminates useful debates because your solution ends up being "put the people who agree with each other together". Also, people having common ground doesn't mean they will behave rationally when they run into differences. I would rather debate socialism with someone rational who believes in it rather than a strawman portrayed by someone else in the capitalist bucket I get thrown into.