3 ms·

Even if it wasn't collapsed that would still be a pretty lame looking bridge. Why would you put piles in the river for such a short span? Why is the design so u

Even if it wasn't collapsed that would still be a pretty lame looking bridge. Why would you put piles in the river for such a short span? Why is the design so ugly?

analog31 8y ago
I'm wondering if the river was expected to provide some protection from frost heaving during the winter.
ggcdn 8y ago
The contract was like $350,000 for a bridge in rural Saskatchewan! Of course it's going to be ugly.
- Serow225 8y ago
  :)
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]