3 ms·
To me it seems all the work of the same spammer(s). In such a case, do some manual intelligence and wrap it up. It won't scale to all forms of spam, but if a si
by contem 8y ago
To me it seems all the work of the same spammer(s). In such a case, do some manual intelligence and wrap it up. It won't scale to all forms of spam, but if a simple regex can uncover 250k+ results in 10 minutes, a manual spam fighter can still block millions of pages a day (and warn the webhost, remove these flakey ads from their networks, etc.).
No doubt the recent machine learning hype has given spammers more advanced tools to avoid detection.
- scrollaway 8y agoFalse positives are far more problematic than false negatives...
- contem 8y agoIf you remove from index... sure. But for that URL that I posted, do you think there is even a single false positive in there?