Most defences of AMP seem to focus on how all the Bad Stuff(tm) is a property of how Google does AMP (As if anyone else showing users AMP pages is relevant), an

Most defences of AMP seem to focus on how all the Bad Stuff(tm) is a property of how Google does AMP (As if anyone else showing users AMP pages is relevant), and how its an open standard you can "fix the problems with" (You can't fix things in the way Google decides to show users things). It really smells like an android-esque "fake open" move where any complaints about Google's control over the situation is deflected with arguments about how parts of it being open source (But not the parts that are giving Google said control)