3 ms·
So detectability, probably, was not that big of an issue itself. Unless, of course, he got it into his head that Inuit didn't have cancers, and then started ma
by hugh3 16y ago
So detectability, probably, was not that big of an issue itself.
Unless, of course, he got it into his head that Inuit didn't have cancers, and then started making false diagnoses based on that.
Look, I don't know how much of this story is true and how much of it is made up. Certainly the part where he's a trained physician seems to have been made up. The part where he examined fifty thousand Inuit plus a significant of westerners per year in between his actual duties as a ship's captain appears to be completely implausible. If this random anecdote is the best evidence we have that living with a traditional Eskimo diet will signficantly lower your chance of cancer, I think it's safe to say that the evidence for the hypothesis is pretty darn pissweak.
- fnl 16y agoAverage inuit lifespan is about 45 years - however, that means they had a higher life expectancy than we did before we surpassed them. So the extremely cold environment does seem to help (although you just won't get me there :) http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2008/07/mortality-and-lifespan-of-inuit.html http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2008/07/mortality-and-...