4 ms·
So some kind of semi-private transport (e.g. shared autonomous cars) is probably required You can have the on-demand voice-activated self-driving car experienc
by gaius 8y ago
So some kind of semi-private transport (e.g. shared autonomous cars) is probably required
You can have the on-demand voice-activated self-driving car experience right now: it’s called a taxi. Is that viable for all your use cases?
- alkonaut 8y agoTaxi prices would have to be substantially lower for taxi to be a viable alternative. Perhaps for some of the use cases there could be better utilization (meaning cheaper) taxi, e.g. a taxi picking up my kids for school could also pick up a few more.
- gpm 8y agoTo everyone above wondering why people think self driving cars will help. This is why. Eliminate the driver and taxis become way cheaper (probably cheaper than owning a car). That means people like alkonaut here will be far more interested in just not owning their own car that sits idle except when they are personally driving it. Which reduces the amount of space we are spending on car storage.
- gaius 8y agowhy people think self driving cars will help Why do you think they will be cheaper? Get ready for surge pricing being the norm. If you don’t have a vehicle of your own, you’ll have no choice but to pay. That’s why investors are willing to pour untold billions into this, they expect a massive payoff.
- gpm 8y agoBecause people are frickin expensive. I'm sure that investors will extract a nice sum of money, but it's their ability to outcompete taxis on price that will allow them to do that. Or to put it another way they don't need to extract $30,000/car/year^1 and competition means they won't be able to. ^1 what ddg tells me the average US taxi driver salary is.