5 ms·

Are you kidding me? I've been shit upon by this apple circle jerk and you get at me? What rules did I break while they didn't? Edit: I really hope it wasn't yo

Are you kidding me? I've been shit upon by this apple circle jerk and you get at me? What rules did I break while they didn't? Edit: I really hope it wasn't you downvoting me instead of an answer...this is getting quite ridiculous.

dang 8y ago
You were uncivil and you insinuated that other users were astroturfing. That's two guidelines right there. Also, we've had to warn you before. (Mods can't downvote replies to themselves, same as other users.)
- Krasnol 8y ago
  > You were uncivil I started being uncivil after they started being uncivil. Why is it me that is to blame here? I mean, they seem to be so agitated that they are downvoting me 3 days later! > you insinuated that other users were astroturfing Where did I do this?
  - dang 8y ago
    I might have missed it where people started being uncivil to you first. We don't see all the comments. But it also doesn't make breaking the rules ok—even if others break them, you (i.e. we all) still have to follow them. It always feels like the other person started it anyhow... Re astroturfing I was referring to "Are you his second account".
    - Krasnol 8y ago
      > I might have missed it where people started being uncivil to you first. We don't see all the comments. I...what? You can't click "parent" and get a context? Or come here with a different account/firefox container? What sense does that make? This is ridiculous. I mean, it's right there... I never said the rules are bad. There is nothing wrong with the rules. There is just something wrong if they are being enforced selectively. > Re astroturfing I was referring to "Are you his second account". You might read up what astroturfing is. Because this is not how it works: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing Besides the fact that I even explained that I said that to emphasize my argument that followed it. Would you please read the whole thing before you judge? I mean, seriously this doesn't make any sense this way.

dang 8y ago

You were uncivil and you insinuated that other users were astroturfing. That's two guidelines right there. Also, we've had to warn you before. (Mods can't downvote replies to themselves, same as other users.)

Krasnol 8y ago
> You were uncivil I started being uncivil after they started being uncivil. Why is it me that is to blame here? I mean, they seem to be so agitated that they are downvoting me 3 days later! > you insinuated that other users were astroturfing Where did I do this?
- dang 8y ago
  I might have missed it where people started being uncivil to you first. We don't see all the comments. But it also doesn't make breaking the rules ok—even if others break them, you (i.e. we all) still have to follow them. It always feels like the other person started it anyhow... Re astroturfing I was referring to "Are you his second account".
  - Krasnol 8y ago
    > I might have missed it where people started being uncivil to you first. We don't see all the comments. I...what? You can't click "parent" and get a context? Or come here with a different account/firefox container? What sense does that make? This is ridiculous. I mean, it's right there... I never said the rules are bad. There is nothing wrong with the rules. There is just something wrong if they are being enforced selectively. > Re astroturfing I was referring to "Are you his second account". You might read up what astroturfing is. Because this is not how it works: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing Besides the fact that I even explained that I said that to emphasize my argument that followed it. Would you please read the whole thing before you judge? I mean, seriously this doesn't make any sense this way.