3 ms·
It may be worth clarifying that this isn't "papers of" as in "scholarly publications in journals by", but as in "pieces of paper associated with"; these are nic
by gjm11 8y ago
It may be worth clarifying that this isn't "papers of" as in "scholarly publications in journals by", but as in "pieces of paper associated with"; these are nice high-resolution scans of a box of papers at Trinity College, Cambridge relating to Ramanujan. Letters between other mathematicians about Ramanujan's work; some handwritten manuscripts by Ramanujan himself (including the famous "Lost Notebook"); a passport photo of Ramanujan.
Definitely interesting for Ramanujan enthusiasts, but if you're looking for (say) his papers with Hardy about partitions, numbers of prime factors of "typical" numbers, etc., then this isn't the place to go.
- theoh 8y agoIt's a standard expression. Googling the phrase "papers of" brings up mostly hits for archives of documents with the description "Papers of <name>" where <name> is someone noteworthy.
- saagarjha 8y agoUnfortunately with mathematicians and scientists the term "paper" is overloaded because they write academic papers, which leads to ambiguity.