3 ms·

Definitely not the securities fraud or slander on Twitter?

• ben_w 8y ago
  Agreed that weed itself is irrelevant (though I literally don’t believe that $420 wasn’t a drugs reference even though it’s been explicitly denied), unlike violating the rules about manipulating share prices and the defamation on Twitter. Looks to me like chronic overwork. How do we convince him to take a holiday?
  • swarnie_ 8y ago
    Maybe the £420 comment was a typo for $240 and his resent public meltdown are intentional in order to tank the company and buy it out cheap. Ill get the tinfoil now...