3 ms·

How a guy smoking a joint can trouble you is beyond me.

• swarnie_ 8y ago
  Definitely not the securities fraud or slander on Twitter?
  • ben_w 8y ago
    Agreed that weed itself is irrelevant (though I literally don’t believe that $420 wasn’t a drugs reference even though it’s been explicitly denied), unlike violating the rules about manipulating share prices and the defamation on Twitter. Looks to me like chronic overwork. How do we convince him to take a holiday?
    • swarnie_ 8y ago
      Maybe the £420 comment was a typo for $240 and his resent public meltdown are intentional in order to tank the company and buy it out cheap. Ill get the tinfoil now...
• dagw 8y ago
  It's not the smoking a joint part that is troublesome (and let's face it, he didn't really 'smoke'), but the how and when and why part and what it say about his judgement (or lack of it). Unless you buy the theory that he did it to cleverly deflect attention away from something else.
  • Faaak 8y ago
    I buy the theory that he just wanted to have fun ?