3 ms·
Or, just change the clocks twice a year. Sounds like you are advocating the same end result (one-hour shift twice a year to preserve afternoon daylight time),
by ycombobreaker 8y ago
Or, just change the clocks twice a year. Sounds like you are advocating the same end result (one-hour shift twice a year to preserve afternoon daylight time), but simply abolishing the current implementation. The present implementation is well understood, and most importantly standardized and automated at scale. Anything else would require massive effort to switch toward, so can you explain why it is a net improvement to spend that effort?
- Natanael_L 8y agoThe improvement is that we won't have a clock that's permanently arbitrarily shifted because of ancient convention.
- jonathanstrange 8y agoThe time on the unshifted clock is also an arbitrary convention.