3 ms·
Well more specifically, what I was trying to say is, if you wanted to be part of, say - the cross-stitching community, and you made a post about how over-under
by hello_marmalade 8y ago
Well more specifically, what I was trying to say is, if you wanted to be part of, say - the cross-stitching community, and you made a post about how over-under stitching sucks, and so the owner of that server banned you, and then let every other cross-stitching based mastodon know about your terrible stitching beliefs, then while you can still "join" another mastodon instance, you are effectively removed completely from the "cross-stitching community".
From what I'm aware of, this has kinda happened with certain instances have essentially been blackballed by the groups of instances which don't like them, or whatever.
- gnopgnip 8y agoThat is only if the entire cross stitching community chooses to remove you. The alternative is facebook, and if facebook decides to remove you it doesn't matter what the cross stitching community says, you are out
- westpfelia 8y agoWell in that case couldnt said person create their own community? Assuming there are those in Mastodon that don't agree with the (possibly repeated) actions of the server admin people will start to leave. So no matter what there is still an option. Unlike Facebook/Twitter. I mean technically even InfoWars and Alex Jones could start their own community and by the rules of Mastodon not get kicked off. Please no one tell Alex Jones about Mastodon.
- pferde 8y agoNo, someone please do tell Alex Jones about Mastodon. The sooner a problem is encountered, the sooner a solution is found. The alternative is to bump into that problem farther down the line, where solving it will be much costlier. And if Mastodon will crumble because of Alex Jones, it would have crumbled eventually because of someone else like that.