3 ms·
Importantly, though, intent isn't required to make a discrimination claim under the Civil Rights Act. If a policy is apparently neutral, but it has a dispropor
by jforman 8y ago
Importantly, though, intent isn't required to make a discrimination claim under the Civil Rights Act. If a policy is apparently neutral, but it has a disproportionally negative impact on a protected class, it is illegal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact
IBM's lawyers are surely aware of this. This is likely going to be painful for them and they did it anyway knowing the liability.
- adrianratnapala 8y agoNot sure why you thought that was news to markbnj, or relevant to the point made.
- austhrow743 8y agoThey talked about an "ageist conspiracy". Above post is saying an ageist conspiracy isn't required.