Without a public statement even saying they disagree with it, which seems to go against their pro-privacy principles and goes against what they've done in other

Without a public statement even saying they disagree with it, which seems to go against their pro-privacy principles and goes against what they've done in other government-based privacy disagreements they've had. I wish they'd make actions against their principles more transparent lest people think it's just lip service they are paying to the masses.