4 ms·
Agreed. Interesting to see the trends though, considering ror 3 went golden a few weeks ago. (Btw, I use both aspnet mvc and ror depending on client requirement
by httpitis 16y ago
Agreed. Interesting to see the trends though, considering ror 3 went golden a few weeks ago. (Btw, I use both aspnet mvc and ror depending on client requirements).
- msbarnett 16y agoI suspect the "trend", such as it is, is entirely meaningless. When Ruby on Rails was new and unfamiliar, people tended to google its full, cumbersome name. Now, people tend to just shorten it to "Rails", and indeed the top three hits for that are Ruby on Rails sites. There's no meaning to be found in this chart.
- LaGrange 16y agoThis is more fun: http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22asp.net+mvc%22%2C+ruby+rails%2C+%22ruby+on+rails%22%2C+ http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22asp.net+mvc%22%2C+ruby+rai... asp.net+mvc&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 Mind that ruby rails probably includes searches for "ruby on rails". Sadly, clean trends for "rails" are not really meaningful - mass transit seems to be most popular of these all.