> just the quality that we need in a kernel maintainer. I disagree this is the case. "This is how it's been done" is a terrible excuse for anything. This attem

> just the quality that we need in a kernel maintainer. I disagree this is the case. "This is how it's been done" is a terrible excuse for anything. This attempt at protection of the status quo is wrong because almost without exception the status quo is sub optimal. > because I doubt that he could steer his ship without it There is no reason to believe this.