I don't feel that this post is fair. You can't say "we can't do solve real world tasks with functional programming because Haskell isn't practical." I'm sure t

I don't feel that this post is fair. You can't say "we can't do solve real world tasks with functional programming because Haskell isn't practical." I'm sure this isn't a fair analysis either, but I think it's an accepted belief that pure functional languages don't fit with how the world works. That doesn't mean that functional languages with side effects (multi-paradigm is probably the correct term) like Lisp, given the recent rise of Clojure, or F# can't be used in the real world.