4 ms·
> Compared to new gas plants, new nuclear plants are extremely expensive. This was an explicit policy of the enviros to stop nuclear construction back in the 8
by dmfdmf 8y ago
> Compared to new gas plants, new nuclear plants are extremely expensive.
This was an explicit policy of the enviros to stop nuclear construction back in the 80's and 90's. The NRC had a separate license to build then operate a plant. The enviros could not stop the licensing but tied up the license to operate in endless lawsuits and killed a number of projects. It was the licensing delays, not actual construction costs, that killed nuclear in the USA. Power utility CEOs stopped ordering plants when the path to licensed operation was blocked and could add 100's of millions of unknown costs in delays and lawsuits.
I think the NRC later revised the process to stream-line licensing and minimize the risks but no private utility is willing to go first. The enviros have threatened to sue the NRC if they use the new license process and tie that up in court. There had been talk of the TVA or some other govt utility going first but I have not heard of that lately.
- davidf18 8y agoI don't understand why environmentalists would prefer carbon-based fuel greenhouse gas power plants over nuclear. Does that make any sense to anyone? I wish some major journalist would ask this question and get an appropriate response.
- skybrian 8y agoThat might make sense as long as "streamlining" doesn't also involve subsidies for things like catastrophe insurance. Would nuclear be cost-effective without subsidies?