3 ms·
>You'll have to show me one inventive and useful "ninja" trick revolving around the use of '=='. 1. I was making a generalized statement around JS, not specifi
by paradite 8y ago
>You'll have to show me one inventive and useful "ninja" trick revolving around the use of '=='.
1. I was making a generalized statement around JS, not specifically '=='. That's a misinterpretation of my statement.
>"my programming language is perfect"
2. I did not say JavaScript is perfect. That's a misinterpretation of my statement.
>"if you don't like it you're just too dumb to get it"
3. I did not say "if you don't like you're just too dumb." That's a misinterpretation of my statement.
- thebuzzsaw 8y agoDid you stop to consider that maybe you conveyed these ideas regardless of whether you meant to? JavaScript really _isn't_ all that expressive.
- paradite 8y agoI tried my best, but I can't control how other people interpret it. That's what comments are for after all, to deal with information asymmetry like this. I just don't get it. What's wrong with expressing my love for a language that I love? I am not even asking for anyone to switch to JS, just expressing my feel.
- keymone 8y agowhat's wrong with people disagreeing with you? isn't that what comments are (partly) for?
- paradite 8y agoYes. Maybe I am too conscious of people disagreeing with each other. It's actually very normal. Thanks for pointing that out. I think might be due to the downvotes somehow. It makes you wonder if you did something wrongly or it is simply people disagreeing with you.