4 ms·
You can see the up/down arrows in the screenshots, which indicates that he was not only logged in (because of the existence of the down arrow), but hadn't yet v
by sounddust 16y ago
You can see the up/down arrows in the screenshots, which indicates that he was not only logged in (because of the existence of the down arrow), but hadn't yet voted.
- rbanffy 16y agoMaybe he took the screenshots before voting.
- jacquesm 16y agoOk, how would he have to show they were at -X if he had pushed them up again. That's what the screenshots were for. No point in contaminating his 'evidence'. Really, you're reading a lot in to very little. Argue the case of the downvotes, not the man behind the criticism, of course he could have upvoted them, but he still can, can't he ?
- sounddust 16y agoI'm not trying to criticize the OP. My point was that downvoting isn't a problem if people are pushing them up again. If a comment is sitting at zero and you are capable of pushing it to +1, then there isn't a problem yet, assuming the comment deserves to be at +1 (and in my opinion, +1 is a fair score for the first two). In other words, it's not worth complaining about downvotes until good comments are getting stuck in negative territory and you can't do anything about it. When that happens, I think that this is a discussion worth having. I don't think we're there yet. Argue the case of the downvotes I did, in my 2nd and 3rd paragraphs (the majority of what I wrote).