4 ms·
I made a comment in a thread the other week suggesting that Wired's UK editor was hurting his ability to cover Facebook by not using the service, and it was dow
by shortformblog 16y ago
I made a comment in a thread the other week suggesting that Wired's UK editor was hurting his ability to cover Facebook by not using the service, and it was downvoted, and I couldn't figure out why:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1726192 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1726192
Granted, it was a little bombastic and was written in a sarcastic way, but there was a good point in there and it was actually upvoted significantly before someone else made a response criticizing what I said.
I didn't understand why it was downvoted. As someone in the journalism field, I found it to be surprising that he could continue to make good points in articles about Facebook without using the service.
- jcl 16y agoThe snark was uncalled for; you could have made your point without attacking the man directly. And, in fact, you do so in the second half of your comment -- which means the first half was doubly unnecessary.