3 ms·
Better than 50-50 I guess
by lsh123 8y ago
Better than 50-50 I guess
- thaumasiotes 8y agoOK, but why 50-50? There's no reason to expect that a priori. It's also better then 55-45 and 20-80, but none of those is good.
- justtopost 8y agoI think he was implying that better than 50% implies its at least not mostly bullshit, or that we could perhaps draw usful inferrences if we are right at least most of the time. But agreed, none are particularly enthusing.
- forgingahead 8y agoI think he was being sarcastic and highlighting the absurdity of the situation.