3 ms·
I don’t get this. Features complicate products and require maintenance. By your logic, features would never get built because they’d carry a lifelong burden.
by gonyea 8y ago
I don’t get this. Features complicate products and require maintenance. By your logic, features would never get built because they’d carry a lifelong burden.
- tboughen 8y agoI think the idea is that the ‘long tail’ of users that such use features can still be 10s of millions for google, and preserving can act as a most preventing these power users from seeking alternatives. And then taking other users with them.
- Moru 8y agoIt's the frustration of people building their workflow on those features that is talking. It's very irritating when you find yourself in the position during your hard earned vacation to (once again) have to find a new option for something that your company needs to function.
- snaky 8y agoIt's not linear. GCD haven't got traction (and billions of revenue) it might have now because of shutdown of some products like Reader. And that's oversimplified example actually. People's minds are not linear, especially when they make decisions. The only market when you can do well with raw numbers only is cheapest 10%, when all competition is about price, and customers have zero loyalty whatsoever.
- dredmorbius 8y agoGCD?
- snaky 8y agoA typo, Google Cloud Platform.
- dredmorbius 8y agoThanks.
- llampx 8y agoChalk one up to exactly that. I recommend against GCP exactly because of the Reader SNAFU (among others).