You mean the 63 citations that are either quotes from news articles or referrals to sister publications? And the rest are just citations to vanilla data? It's

You mean the 63 citations that are either quotes from news articles or referrals to sister publications? And the rest are just citations to vanilla data? It's interesting that citations for their actual claims/arguments are completely missing like this: >Although California is viewed as having perhaps the nicest weather in the nation, it has suffered from domestic out-migration for many years. >A tax increase in one jurisdiction may cause an initial out-migration to other jurisdictions. >An income tax increase in a state may cause individuals to out-migrate over time. >High earners are often entrepreneurs, and they may move their businesses and related jobs with them when they migrate. >The capping of federal deductibility has increased the state and local tax bite on millions of households in high-tax states. At the same time, today people can easily find information to compare state tax burdens. CATO is a think tank in the most oxymoronic sense. Fuck off with that "omg big number citation" non-sense.